Wednesday, August 18, 2010

Nordic Digra Day 2 - live notes

Nordic Digra Conference, 17th August, 2010, DSV, Kista, Stockholm, Sweden. These are my live diary notes from the second day of the conference.



Paper Session: Game Design


Hagen, Designing for Player Experience: How Professional Game Developers Communicate Design Visions

//not taking notes, already read the paper (a great paper).

QA
Björn - Don’t you reiterate the auteur myth of the single genius? Two way communication?
Ulf: Usually it is a design team. If the production involve hundreds of persons all can’t have a say. But important to communicate the vision so that everyone has it, be on the same track, be involved.
Lina: Diversity?
U: I tried to tell them...
Staffan: examples seem based on GDC talks, not on the interviews?
Ulf: They talked about the same thing.



Holopainen, et al., Modelling Experimental Game Design
2010-08-16-17-NDigra 104
nationally funded project, Nokia and 2 universities

experimental game design.
what is game design as an activity?

showing the waterfall model.
the iterative model.
open the black box of game design.
no one can stop the hamster - low-fi augmented reality game. Played at a big convention in Tampere.
markers with different shapes that could be recognised by cellphone cameras.
Catch the worm holes by using the camera. Build up energy in camera by moving it and then press the button to capture at the right moment.

documentation of work. Used body storming.
SW sketches.
kept the whole documentation of the process.
then used two models to analyse the data.
Löwgren and Stolterman; vision - , operative image - (the first explicit operative proto, like body storming and sketches on whiteboards, user interface-sketch), - 3 Specfication
In the work the team leaped between layers, but ended up with an operative image that could be used to construct the final artefact.

Lawson’s model of designing. Not sequential.
reflection-in-action. Excerpts from design diaries.

QA
Jesper: assuming you read the models before you did the design work. Did this have an impact?
Jussi: We did the design and documenting before we looked at the model.
Staffan: If you chose models in retrospect, wouldn’t this have an impact on the result of the analysis.
Jussi: yes, [then list of models, like buxton’s] but they didn’t give us the same insight as these two models.
Jon: What kind of refinement to these models did you find?
Jussi: we didn’t make that explicit, but it has an implicit effect, it can help us to refine methods and techniques in future work. Co-workers in this proj are doing their phd theses on the topic of design processes.




Björk, On Making Good Games - Using Player Virtue Ethics and Gameplay Design Patterns to Identify Generally Desirable Gameplay Features

2010-08-16-17-NDigra 127
on making good games... civilization, wow, all have pros and cons, and all players don’t like al features... Farmville, Cowclicker...
Is it good if is popular? no insight in what makes it good.
good reviews?

Inherently good features in games?
Showing jesper juul’s diagram.
The MDA model.
Lazarro’s model.

Models specify emotions: these can be seen as design goals.

Turn it around, look at the player. What makes a good player (not a good human). Sicart looks at Aristotielian virtues. They are good at mid-level generally, like bravery. (too little; coward, too much; stupid)

But how recognise a good game, the game as an artifact //didn’t we have a long discussion about the expression artifact, if the game is an artifact or not in Tampere in March?

design patterns.
Looked at negative and positive patterns, finding that the positive ones tended to include social aspects.

Suggesting a way of understanding good games as games which encourage people to be good players,

QA
Jonas: so here we have Sicard, who uses Bartle’s paper from 94, and Aristotle... and then you compare them with design patters. Don’t you think the level of abstraction is too high?
Staffan: the patterns are very concrete, but I agree that there are many steps, that’s why I want to focus on the process rather than on the end result.
Jonas: it’s not hard to say that king making is a destructive pattern, don’t need Aristotle for that.
Petri: Why should players be good when they are playing? There may be a disconnection between the concepts of good games and good players. Does game play affect behaviour outside the game...?
Staffan: Not about being something or anything outside the game. In Montola’s example from yesterday people do go outside the game, or rather the effect of the game does...
Petri: but then you have selected a type of ethics that doesn’t say anything concrete.
Staffan [soldiering on]: Can narrow it down to one part, it doesn’t have to be pointless to look at a single part.
Jon: you chose to not use the MDA, instead on virtues. ... difference between the actual behaviour of players and the aesthetics the play of it result in...
Jon: Are you saying that wow is better than civ?
S: No, trying to provide a way to talk about them, to compare them. Game not better the more patterns there is in it.



Christopher Sandberg’s keynote.

The Conspiracy for Good
design for change - real change in the world. Zambia.
library in danger. enemy: Blackwell bridge.
showing film documentary style of the real village and the village school.
online puzzle. Morse-code in the music, possible to decipher hidden messages.
the leaked lobby film.
the resistance movement film

2010-08-16-17-NDigra 141

coffe: create the villains and the assistants in the fiction. “I am not a member.”
This is the setting of the game.

ppl engaging in the game hacked the blackwell security system.
track main figures //actors // on ovi-maps (a kind of google map)
geocashing in cities to find the content. Content in Africa, in five European countries, and all over London.

main character Nadira. Blackwell’s smear campaign of her.

4 events in London this summer. The technology on the mobile devices actually worked in this pilot.
Showing films from the events. A tag hidden at Tate modern.
coffe talking about object oriented story telling.
and showing photos of NPCs - real people acting as guards at the London Bridge.

//Cool with the hidden clues in the music.
live music. An opera singer singing with clues in the music.

action 2
big group of players setting up a distraction, dance parade blocking the view for the goons so resistance movement can get into a building.

Now players have a LARP head quarter, but they still need to bring Blackwell down.

action 3
hostage trade-off.
players getting pronoia - the sneaking suspicion that people are out to make your life fun.
resitance movement guy getting shot.

even 4
the take down.
marketing event. plasma screen and hor d’ouvres, blackwell organising. recruitment.
resistance movement. Hacks the press release. Showing the president shooting the resistance guy in the head.
take-down succeeded.

safehouses: 10 bars in London

easy to loos track of the zambian village during the process, but they are still there - video.
10 000 books. 50 girls got scholarship. And we built the library.

//ok, i’m about to cry.

QA
Linderoth: If change society, why not do it for real instead of making games
Coffe: there are organisations who do that, Greenpeace, amnesty etc
This is another try to do that. An experiment on how to use story. We can’t tell the real story about the mining companies in the Zambia, that would be shut down. But we could have a fictional story. Also reach people who not normally engage in this type of work to help, to change
Marie Denward: What about participants who doesn’t know that they are taking part in a game. For example in Sanningen om Marika all participants didn’t know.
Coffe: The online room for meta discussions, monitor but stay away. Talk to moderators if needed to give information. There were debriefing spaces as well around the city of London. We had police, doctors and security personnel in the background the whole time. Also in the sets there were little chance that passers-by would stumble into it. People had to make an effort to find locations where dramatic things happened. If in town there was more light weight activities and drama was constrained to video clips on cellphones.
Jon: the keys and the clues... comments on the design choices? Some are not so obvious.
Coffe: clear game markers when needed. Some were obvious, but at other points we put the sign/logo. It is important to sustain the magic circle we have found in this type of production.

Staffan: how did you recruit players? How many did you have?
C: lots of different rabbit holes. The web page. (what membership is denied). Downloads to cell phones. a downloaded game which gave clues. 1/4 million downloads. A music site (400 k users) hiding clues in music. New compositions made. A plethora of things. Some people came from Alaska or Canada.
Tanja: Did you get stuck with players, did you need to do last minute changes?
C: yes, always. A time travel problem. Want to get as much as possible done in pre-production, but then you are real-time in the street - did people really find that geocash?
We did on the fly rewriting of the story and sent of actors to ‘fix’ the progression of the story.
Maria D: back to sanningen om Marika, there you also had a chance to have an impact on politics, on real world. Here, books and library, but what about the participants?
C: I’m not sure. We didn’t tell people to “do good”. But you were given clues by for example volunteer to give out flyers for doctors of the world. Players see it as source materials for their characters... exposing people to facts and organisations.

me: was there a possibility that the take-down would fail?
c: yes. There are always crazy people. Griefers destroying. Ways to orchestrate these people, learnt a lot by these production. Give griefers extra special personal tasks to perform so they can still have fun without disrupting.

www.thecompanyp.com




Paper Session: Massively-Multiplayer Online Games



Prax, Leadership Style in World of Warcraft Raid Guilds
2010-08-16-17-NDigra 157
country-club style leadership and authority compliance style leadership conducted by guild leaders depending on in-game situations; in raids and outside the raids.
Members of different types of guilds interviewed.
Interviews with real-life leaders in different types of organisations. Big difference is that in a game the guild leader doesn’t have to report to anyone else, such as stockholders. Interviewed 6 leaders, but the useful ones in terms of similarity was the air-force and a student radio.

QA
Carl: compare raid group to ideological counterparts? Such as antifascist action? Similar janus-faced leadership in such groups.
P: Interesting
Jon: small companies/large companies?
P: I looked at that, but even in a small organisation there was a difference in the stake holding situation.
Jon: Guild leading as a reference in real life...?
P: my examples were where the same persons were raid- and guild-leaders. Useful to train different leadership styles depending on context.
Jessica: real life examples of people using it in their CVs?
P: not sure of statistics or examples of that
Q: Comment: I heard of an example where a large company in the US did hire someone based on his guild leading experience
P: please send ref!
Ulrika: Surgery?
P: Interesting!
Björn: time constraint. Can make comparison to any group that involves need of result of work and a time constraint? Coordinate people. Perhaps not any job but... a busy restaurant, at lunch hour more intense.
P: you wouldn’t kick an employee out of the restaurant if he stopped to chit-chat once...




Eklund and Johansson, What Happened with Social Play? A study of social interaction in temporary group formation (PUG) in World of Warcraft


2010-08-16-17-NDigra 162

Structures of social interactions in pick-up groups on WoW.
Dungeons in heroic mode. Alternative endgame to raiding.
LfG system that came with the Burning Crusade expansion.
LfG system took in players from different servers meaning that the social control was lessened. No reputation to be wrecked if on different server.
Instrumental interaction. Ppl didn’t even say hi or goodbye. Low social investment. Grinding. Run through as fast as possible and get as much rewards as possible. Even in down-time, waiting for replacement to the group, people didn’t chat even if they were clearly bored (jumping around, but not talking).

QA:
AnneMette: No social norms? Clearly there would be some norms, what do you put in the word?
Magnus: All part of different norm systems. In this situation we can’t see *what* norms are used.
Jonas L: You can lift the level of analysis if you relate it to the economic models that underlie this type of game, that it is made more and more casual to draw more players.
Ulrika: You don’t necessarily need to see chat as the primary way of communication when you look at social interaction. How are you going to continue your work? Non verbal communication?
Lina: Probably not do interaction analysis. Players know what to do in the dungeons, they just run along and do it. They don’t stop and look behind to see if the others are there following...
Patrick: A J said, WoW changes, the unsocial play style... the game is old, people already have their social lives worked out there. If two guilidies happen to be in the same PUG they talk on an own channel, and if they are ‘alone’ in the PUG they might engage in guildchat in parallell... so social interaction may happen
Jon. People do strange things in PUGs. I happened to have my fishing rod equipped and coming from an RP server, that struck up conversation in the group.
Ulf: Final comment: Next step to replace the players with NPCs if they do single player gaming among each other.




• Johansson and Verhagen, And Justice for All - the 10 commandments of Online Games, and then some…


2010-08-16-17-NDigra 170

rules created by clans and guilds in online games. Ie the rules defined by players rather than the game design.

Data collected from clan and guild sites that had information on rules.
Looked and different mmo guilds and fps clans.

//...spending a lot of time talking about previous work.

QA:
Patrick: During the act of play when focus is on effectiveness, many rules are about that, while other rules apply in social situations, could you comment?
Magnus: Yes many similarities.
Mats: ganking and griefplay... how define when it happens
Magnus: depends on who is at the receiving end. And different groups and contexts. For example, a group what has ganking as its goal.




Paper Session: Case Studies



Waern, “I'm in love with someone that doesn't exist!!” Bleed in the context of a Computer Game

annika stats with showing a violent promo movie.
then a clip of a conversation, a man in love trying to express it verbally. (“alistair romance scene” youtube.)

2010-08-16-17-NDigra 184

the cheesiness of romance in games.
romance occurs often as a narrative component in plot lines. Often optional side plot lines. Sometimes part of the game play mechanism.
Player characters. Sociolotron.

Showing a quote of someone in love with the character Alistair - how can this happen?
Searched for comments about emotional reactions on forums and blogs.

causes for bleed-:
safe zone. True emotions, but no real concrete romance in real life. Like teen age girl idolisation. cyber-romance, role-played romance.
character as projected identity. a theoretical identity that player wishes to be in the context of the game world.
partial agency. feel in control, but then not being able to control. interesting frustration.

Annika not sure how much of this was intended in the design.

QA
AnneMarie: what difference does it make if it is intended?
A: im interested because of the design-perspective I have
Staffan: ...
A: yes you choose to engage
Jesper: the term ‘Bleed’, how would you relate the term ...
A: not my purpose with the papers, it is one of these mushy terms.... relate to the false belief that we would only have one identity...
Patrick: this mechanism in a multi-player game?
A: most causes of romance bleed are multi-player. Interesting here is that it only is a single player game so it is easier to analyse. in multi-player you also perform towards other players, creates a slightly different context.





Jonsson, The Nook. A Fieldstudy of the Game Café as a Third Place



field study of a café in stockholm.
why do people go to a game café to play? Many have the same ones at home along with fast internet connection and good hardware, but they still go to the café. 5 cafés in stockholm. Late opening hours, even nighttime, it is very accessible. Targets young people.
The third place. Oldenburg 1997. ‘the great good place’
young ppl restricted at home - gaming restricted, game time limited. At the game cafe they felt they could manage their own time.

//How does this deepen our understanding of third places or gaming cafés?

QA
Q: Genderdistribution?
Fatima: 3% girls. Didn't come in groups, either alone or with boy friend.
Q: since it costs money, do people hang around without playing, just socializing?
F: no.
Q: Spectatorship? Can be problematic to feel to be under scrutiny. In third place concept, so positive... but at these places people can be very harsh to each other.
F: good point. I didn’t see that so much in my study, perhaps because it was an older crowd in my study. It is a quite exclusive crowd. Officially open to everyone, but not so culturally open to girls and women.
Q how long were the interviews?
F 50 -55 interviews which sometimes lasted for long, since i interviewed them while they were playing.
Q: structured interviews?
F: semi structured
Q: you could lift the analysis, need to problematise more.





Later on:

2010-08-16-17-NDigra 209

No comments: